Coachmen By Forest River 274 RKS vs Coachmen By Forest River 292 Bhds LE — Depreciation Comparison

Coachmen By Forest River 274 RKS vs Coachmen By Forest River 292 Bhds LE: 5-year value retention (56% vs 56%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Coachmen By Forest River 274 RKS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Coachmen By Forest River 274 RKS comes out ahead, holding about 56% of its value versus 56% for the Coachmen By Forest River 292 Bhds LE. Over the first five years the Coachmen By Forest River 274 RKS loses roughly $21,632 while the Coachmen By Forest River 292 Bhds LE loses about $24,546 — a gap near $2,914.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Coachmen By Forest River 274 RKS sheds about 18% in year one versus 12% for the Coachmen By Forest River 292 Bhds LE. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…