Chris-Craft Launch GT 28 Hrtg Trim ED vs Cobalt R3 — Depreciation Comparison

Chris-Craft Launch GT 28 Hrtg Trim ED vs Cobalt R3: 5-year value retention (56% vs 56%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Cobalt R3 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Cobalt R3 comes out ahead, holding about 56% of its value versus 56% for the Chris-Craft Launch GT 28 Hrtg Trim ED. Over the first five years the Cobalt R3 loses roughly $44,734 while the Chris-Craft Launch GT 28 Hrtg Trim ED loses about $126,746 — a gap near $82,012.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Cobalt R3 sheds about 9% in year one versus 33% for the Chris-Craft Launch GT 28 Hrtg Trim ED. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…