Cobia 201 Center Console vs Shallow Stalker CAT 204 Pro CC — Depreciation Comparison

Cobia 201 Center Console vs Shallow Stalker CAT 204 Pro CC: 5-year value retention (66% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Cobia 201 Center Console holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Cobia 201 Center Console comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 66% for the Shallow Stalker CAT 204 Pro CC. Over the first five years the Cobia 201 Center Console loses roughly $16,951 while the Shallow Stalker CAT 204 Pro CC loses about $24,562 — a gap near $7,611.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Cobia 201 Center Console sheds about 8% in year one versus 14% for the Shallow Stalker CAT 204 Pro CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…