Alumacraft MV 1650 AW CC vs Cobia 262 Center Console — Depreciation Comparison

Alumacraft MV 1650 AW CC vs Cobia 262 Center Console: 5-year value retention (64% vs 64%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft MV 1650 AW CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW CC comes out ahead, holding about 64% of its value versus 64% for the Cobia 262 Center Console. Over the first five years the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW CC loses roughly $3,415 while the Cobia 262 Center Console loses about $74,282 — a gap near $70,867.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW CC sheds about 9% in year one versus 17% for the Cobia 262 Center Console. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…