Coleman By Dutchmen 17FQ vs Man Cave Rv TH30 — Depreciation Comparison

Coleman By Dutchmen 17FQ vs Man Cave Rv TH30: 5-year value retention (59% vs 59%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Coleman By Dutchmen 17FQ holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Coleman By Dutchmen 17FQ comes out ahead, holding about 59% of its value versus 59% for the Man Cave Rv TH30. Over the first five years the Coleman By Dutchmen 17FQ loses roughly $8,063 while the Man Cave Rv TH30 loses about $26,073 — a gap near $18,010.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Coleman By Dutchmen 17FQ sheds about 8% in year one versus 27% for the Man Cave Rv TH30. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…