Coleman By Dutchmen 262BHWE vs Merhow 8312 A Rear Kitchen Slide — Depreciation Comparison

Coleman By Dutchmen 262BHWE vs Merhow 8312 A Rear Kitchen Slide: 5-year value retention (54% vs 54%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Coleman By Dutchmen 262BHWE holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Coleman By Dutchmen 262BHWE comes out ahead, holding about 54% of its value versus 54% for the Merhow 8312 A Rear Kitchen Slide. Over the first five years the Coleman By Dutchmen 262BHWE loses roughly $20,600 while the Merhow 8312 A Rear Kitchen Slide loses about $45,218 — a gap near $24,618.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Coleman By Dutchmen 262BHWE sheds about 8% in year one versus 13% for the Merhow 8312 A Rear Kitchen Slide. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…