Cougar Challenger 160 ST JON vs Rhino V176 Stick — Depreciation Comparison

Cougar Challenger 160 ST JON vs Rhino V176 Stick: 5-year value retention (73% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Cougar Challenger 160 ST JON holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Cougar Challenger 160 ST JON comes out ahead, holding about 73% of its value versus 73% for the Rhino V176 Stick. Over the first five years the Cougar Challenger 160 ST JON loses roughly $2,549 while the Rhino V176 Stick loses about $5,155 — a gap near $2,606.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Cougar Challenger 160 ST JON sheds about 5% in year one versus 6% for the Rhino V176 Stick. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…