Crestliner 1600 Vision Tiller vs Lund 1875 Impact SS — Depreciation Comparison

Crestliner 1600 Vision Tiller vs Lund 1875 Impact SS: 5-year value retention (79% vs 79%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Crestliner 1600 Vision Tiller holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Crestliner 1600 Vision Tiller comes out ahead, holding about 79% of its value versus 79% for the Lund 1875 Impact SS. Over the first five years the Crestliner 1600 Vision Tiller loses roughly $2,176 while the Lund 1875 Impact SS loses about $7,909 — a gap near $5,733.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Crestliner 1600 Vision Tiller sheds about 4% in year one versus 4% for the Lund 1875 Impact SS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…