Crestliner 1600 Vision Tiller vs SeaArk FX 2472 CC — Depreciation Comparison

Crestliner 1600 Vision Tiller vs SeaArk FX 2472 CC: 5-year value retention (79% vs 79%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Crestliner 1600 Vision Tiller holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Crestliner 1600 Vision Tiller comes out ahead, holding about 79% of its value versus 79% for the SeaArk FX 2472 CC. Over the first five years the Crestliner 1600 Vision Tiller loses roughly $2,176 while the SeaArk FX 2472 CC loses about $3,702 — a gap near $1,526.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Crestliner 1600 Vision Tiller sheds about 4% in year one versus 6% for the SeaArk FX 2472 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…