Alweld 1648 Mud vs Crestliner 1660 Retriever SC — Depreciation Comparison

Alweld 1648 Mud vs Crestliner 1660 Retriever SC: 5-year value retention (66% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1648 Mud holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Alweld 1648 Mud comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 66% for the Crestliner 1660 Retriever SC. Over the first five years the Alweld 1648 Mud loses roughly $2,083 while the Crestliner 1660 Retriever SC loses about $7,545 — a gap near $5,462.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1648 Mud sheds about 11% in year one versus 19% for the Crestliner 1660 Retriever SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…