Crestliner 1750 Super Hawk vs Lund 1875 Fisherman Sport — Depreciation Comparison

Crestliner 1750 Super Hawk vs Lund 1875 Fisherman Sport: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Crestliner 1750 Super Hawk holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Crestliner 1750 Super Hawk comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the Lund 1875 Fisherman Sport. Over the first five years the Crestliner 1750 Super Hawk loses roughly $11,787 while the Lund 1875 Fisherman Sport loses about $13,828 — a gap near $2,041.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Crestliner 1750 Super Hawk sheds about 16% in year one versus 19% for the Lund 1875 Fisherman Sport. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…