Crestliner 1950 Sportfish vs Ranger 220FC — Depreciation Comparison

Crestliner 1950 Sportfish vs Ranger 220FC: 5-year value retention (75% vs 75%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Crestliner 1950 Sportfish holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Crestliner 1950 Sportfish comes out ahead, holding about 75% of its value versus 75% for the Ranger 220FC. Over the first five years the Crestliner 1950 Sportfish loses roughly $16,760 while the Ranger 220FC loses about $11,077 — a gap near $-5683.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Crestliner 1950 Sportfish sheds about 18% in year one versus 8% for the Ranger 220FC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…