Cutwater C 32 C Luxury Edition vs Scarab 165 ID — Depreciation Comparison

Cutwater C 32 C Luxury Edition vs Scarab 165 ID: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Cutwater C 32 C Luxury Edition holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Cutwater C 32 C Luxury Edition comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Scarab 165 ID. Over the first five years the Cutwater C 32 C Luxury Edition loses roughly $129,041 while the Scarab 165 ID loses about $11,751 — a gap near $-117290.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Cutwater C 32 C Luxury Edition sheds about 25% in year one versus 10% for the Scarab 165 ID. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…