Duck Water Mini MEE 16 vs Glastron GTD200 BR — Depreciation Comparison

Duck Water Mini MEE 16 vs Glastron GTD200 BR: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Duck Water Mini MEE 16 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Duck Water Mini MEE 16 comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Glastron GTD200 BR. Over the first five years the Duck Water Mini MEE 16 loses roughly $4,347 while the Glastron GTD200 BR loses about $15,658 — a gap near $11,311.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Duck Water Mini MEE 16 sheds about 11% in year one versus 9% for the Glastron GTD200 BR. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…