Duck Water Ocean 17 CC vs Kingfisher 2025 Falcon — Depreciation Comparison

Duck Water Ocean 17 CC vs Kingfisher 2025 Falcon: 5-year value retention (77% vs 77%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Duck Water Ocean 17 CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Duck Water Ocean 17 CC comes out ahead, holding about 77% of its value versus 77% for the Kingfisher 2025 Falcon. Over the first five years the Duck Water Ocean 17 CC loses roughly $5,543 while the Kingfisher 2025 Falcon loses about $8,482 — a gap near $2,939.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Duck Water Ocean 17 CC sheds about 8% in year one versus 16% for the Kingfisher 2025 Falcon. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…