Duckworth 22 Pacific Pro vs Moomba Makai W Raptor 400 — Depreciation Comparison

Duckworth 22 Pacific Pro vs Moomba Makai W Raptor 400: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Duckworth 22 Pacific Pro holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Duckworth 22 Pacific Pro comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Moomba Makai W Raptor 400. Over the first five years the Duckworth 22 Pacific Pro loses roughly $24,332 while the Moomba Makai W Raptor 400 loses about $46,127 — a gap near $21,795.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Duckworth 22 Pacific Pro sheds about 10% in year one versus 22% for the Moomba Makai W Raptor 400. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…