Dusky 252 Twin Rigging CC vs Lund 2000 Alaskan: 5-year value retention (73% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Dusky 252 Twin Rigging CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Dusky 252 Twin Rigging CC comes out ahead, holding about 73% of its value versus 73% for the Lund 2000 Alaskan. Over the first five years the Dusky 252 Twin Rigging CC loses roughly $15,827 while the Lund 2000 Alaskan loses about $11,785 — a gap near $-4042.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Dusky 252 Twin Rigging CC sheds about 21% in year one versus 9% for the Lund 2000 Alaskan. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…