East To West 31K3S vs Viking By Forest River 17SBH — Depreciation Comparison

East To West 31K3S vs Viking By Forest River 17SBH: 5-year value retention (42% vs 42%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. East To West 31K3S holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the East To West 31K3S comes out ahead, holding about 42% of its value versus 42% for the Viking By Forest River 17SBH. Over the first five years the East To West 31K3S loses roughly $32,782 while the Viking By Forest River 17SBH loses about $12,110 — a gap near $-20672.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the East To West 31K3S sheds about 20% in year one versus 23% for the Viking By Forest River 17SBH. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…