Ember 201FBQ vs Glacier Ice House A164RD: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ember 201FBQ holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Ember 201FBQ comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Glacier Ice House A164RD. Over the first five years the Ember 201FBQ loses roughly $19,038 while the Glacier Ice House A164RD loses about $7,132 — a gap near $-11906.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ember 201FBQ sheds about 18% in year one versus 6% for the Glacier Ice House A164RD. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…