Dusky 278 Fshrmns Cuddy Twin vs Excel 1960VCC — Depreciation Comparison

Dusky 278 Fshrmns Cuddy Twin vs Excel 1960VCC: 5-year value retention (72% vs 72%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Dusky 278 Fshrmns Cuddy Twin holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Dusky 278 Fshrmns Cuddy Twin comes out ahead, holding about 72% of its value versus 72% for the Excel 1960VCC. Over the first five years the Dusky 278 Fshrmns Cuddy Twin loses roughly $20,562 while the Excel 1960VCC loses about $4,404 — a gap near $-16158.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Dusky 278 Fshrmns Cuddy Twin sheds about 23% in year one versus 22% for the Excel 1960VCC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…