Flagstaff By Forest River 425M vs Flagstaff By Forest River 832BWS — Depreciation Comparison

Flagstaff By Forest River 425M vs Flagstaff By Forest River 832BWS: 5-year value retention (61% vs 61%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Flagstaff By Forest River 425M holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Flagstaff By Forest River 425M comes out ahead, holding about 61% of its value versus 61% for the Flagstaff By Forest River 832BWS. Over the first five years the Flagstaff By Forest River 425M loses roughly $10,115 while the Flagstaff By Forest River 832BWS loses about $34,476 — a gap near $24,361.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Flagstaff By Forest River 425M sheds about 10% in year one versus 24% for the Flagstaff By Forest River 832BWS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…