Fox Mountain 265RDS vs Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 2500RL: 5-year value retention (52% vs 52%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Fox Mountain 265RDS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Fox Mountain 265RDS comes out ahead, holding about 52% of its value versus 52% for the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 2500RL. Over the first five years the Fox Mountain 265RDS loses roughly $40,815 while the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 2500RL loses about $28,683 — a gap near $-12132.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Fox Mountain 265RDS sheds about 19% in year one versus 24% for the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 2500RL. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…