G3 1652VBW vs Lund 189 Pro V GL: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. G3 1652VBW holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the G3 1652VBW comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the Lund 189 Pro V GL. Over the first five years the G3 1652VBW loses roughly $2,098 while the Lund 189 Pro V GL loses about $29,033 — a gap near $26,935.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the G3 1652VBW sheds about 13% in year one versus 24% for the Lund 189 Pro V GL. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…