Charger 475 Fish & SKI vs G3 1652WSOF — Depreciation Comparison

Charger 475 Fish & SKI vs G3 1652WSOF: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Charger 475 Fish & SKI holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Charger 475 Fish & SKI comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the G3 1652WSOF. Over the first five years the Charger 475 Fish & SKI loses roughly $14,771 while the G3 1652WSOF loses about $2,136 — a gap near $-12635.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Charger 475 Fish & SKI sheds about 11% in year one versus 12% for the G3 1652WSOF. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…