G3 1860WOF vs Lund 1775 Pro Guide: 5-year value retention (71% vs 71%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. G3 1860WOF holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the G3 1860WOF comes out ahead, holding about 71% of its value versus 71% for the Lund 1775 Pro Guide. Over the first five years the G3 1860WOF loses roughly $7,767 while the Lund 1775 Pro Guide loses about $11,197 — a gap near $3,430.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the G3 1860WOF sheds about 12% in year one versus 22% for the Lund 1775 Pro Guide. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…