G3 1860WOFJ vs SeaArk RXT160 CC — Depreciation Comparison

G3 1860WOFJ vs SeaArk RXT160 CC: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. G3 1860WOFJ holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the G3 1860WOFJ comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the SeaArk RXT160 CC. Over the first five years the G3 1860WOFJ loses roughly $6,945 while the SeaArk RXT160 CC loses about $2,596 — a gap near $-4349.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the G3 1860WOFJ sheds about 11% in year one versus 7% for the SeaArk RXT160 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…