G3 Sptsmn 1810 DC Camo vs Lund 1675 Pro Guide: 5-year value retention (74% vs 74%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. G3 Sptsmn 1810 DC Camo holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the G3 Sptsmn 1810 DC Camo comes out ahead, holding about 74% of its value versus 74% for the Lund 1675 Pro Guide. Over the first five years the G3 Sptsmn 1810 DC Camo loses roughly $11,969 while the Lund 1675 Pro Guide loses about $7,246 — a gap near $-4723.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the G3 Sptsmn 1810 DC Camo sheds about 12% in year one versus 6% for the Lund 1675 Pro Guide. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…