Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 17MKE vs Man Cave Rv THFB24 — Depreciation Comparison

Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 17MKE vs Man Cave Rv THFB24: 5-year value retention (50% vs 50%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 17MKE holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 17MKE comes out ahead, holding about 50% of its value versus 50% for the Man Cave Rv THFB24. Over the first five years the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 17MKE loses roughly $23,174 while the Man Cave Rv THFB24 loses about $23,251 — a gap near $77.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 17MKE sheds about 23% in year one versus 26% for the Man Cave Rv THFB24. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…