Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 30G vs Man Cave Rv FW40TS: 5-year value retention (52% vs 52%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 30G holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 30G comes out ahead, holding about 52% of its value versus 52% for the Man Cave Rv FW40TS. Over the first five years the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 30G loses roughly $37,695 while the Man Cave Rv FW40TS loses about $48,335 — a gap near $10,640.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 30G sheds about 24% in year one versus 32% for the Man Cave Rv FW40TS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…