Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 312BHTS vs Palomino By Forest River 374BHCW — Depreciation Comparison

Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 312BHTS vs Palomino By Forest River 374BHCW: 5-year value retention (56% vs 56%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 312BHTS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 312BHTS comes out ahead, holding about 56% of its value versus 56% for the Palomino By Forest River 374BHCW. Over the first five years the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 312BHTS loses roughly $39,810 while the Palomino By Forest River 374BHCW loses about $33,344 — a gap near $-6466.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 312BHTS sheds about 25% in year one versus 9% for the Palomino By Forest River 374BHCW. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…