Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 398M vs Venom By Kz 4013TK — Depreciation Comparison

Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 398M vs Venom By Kz 4013TK: 5-year value retention (52% vs 52%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 398M holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 398M comes out ahead, holding about 52% of its value versus 52% for the Venom By Kz 4013TK. Over the first five years the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 398M loses roughly $73,531 while the Venom By Kz 4013TK loses about $75,757 — a gap near $2,226.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 398M sheds about 20% in year one versus 16% for the Venom By Kz 4013TK. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…