Allmand 26 CC vs H2O Sports 160 CC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Allmand 26 CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Allmand 26 CC comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the H2O Sports 160 CC. Over the first five years the Allmand 26 CC loses roughly $12,678 while the H2O Sports 160 CC loses about $3,708 — a gap near $-8970.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Allmand 26 CC sheds about 6% in year one versus 6% for the H2O Sports 160 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…