H2O Sports 160 CC vs Lund 1852MT: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. H2O Sports 160 CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the H2O Sports 160 CC comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Lund 1852MT. Over the first five years the H2O Sports 160 CC loses roughly $3,708 while the Lund 1852MT loses about $2,303 — a gap near $-1405.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the H2O Sports 160 CC sheds about 6% in year one versus 20% for the Lund 1852MT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…