Aluma Weld Xpress HD15DDP vs Havoc 1553 DB — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress HD15DDP vs Havoc 1553 DB: 5-year value retention (61% vs 61%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Havoc 1553 DB holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Havoc 1553 DB comes out ahead, holding about 61% of its value versus 61% for the Aluma Weld Xpress HD15DDP. Over the first five years the Havoc 1553 DB loses roughly $3,243 while the Aluma Weld Xpress HD15DDP loses about $3,249 — a gap near $6.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Havoc 1553 DB sheds about 11% in year one versus 10% for the Aluma Weld Xpress HD15DDP. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…