Havoc 1653 DB vs Ranger RT188C Crappie — Depreciation Comparison

Havoc 1653 DB vs Ranger RT188C Crappie: 5-year value retention (83% vs 83%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Havoc 1653 DB holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Havoc 1653 DB comes out ahead, holding about 83% of its value versus 83% for the Ranger RT188C Crappie. Over the first five years the Havoc 1653 DB loses roughly $930 while the Ranger RT188C Crappie loses about $6,404 — a gap near $5,474.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Havoc 1653 DB sheds about 3% in year one versus 15% for the Ranger RT188C Crappie. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…