Havoc 1860 DB vs Tracker T16 — Depreciation Comparison

Havoc 1860 DB vs Tracker T16: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Havoc 1860 DB holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Havoc 1860 DB comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Tracker T16. Over the first five years the Havoc 1860 DB loses roughly $3,745 while the Tracker T16 loses about $8,053 — a gap near $4,308.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Havoc 1860 DB sheds about 9% in year one versus 19% for the Tracker T16. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…