Havoc 1860 MST vs RH Aluminum Commander 23: 5-year value retention (89% vs 89%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Havoc 1860 MST holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Havoc 1860 MST comes out ahead, holding about 89% of its value versus 89% for the RH Aluminum Commander 23. Over the first five years the Havoc 1860 MST loses roughly $895 while the RH Aluminum Commander 23 loses about $5,528 — a gap near $4,633.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Havoc 1860 MST sheds about 2% in year one versus 11% for the RH Aluminum Commander 23. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…