Heartland Rvs 29MSB vs Kodiak By Dutchmen 172E — Depreciation Comparison

Heartland Rvs 29MSB vs Kodiak By Dutchmen 172E: 5-year value retention (63% vs 63%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Heartland Rvs 29MSB holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Heartland Rvs 29MSB comes out ahead, holding about 63% of its value versus 63% for the Kodiak By Dutchmen 172E. Over the first five years the Heartland Rvs 29MSB loses roughly $12,319 while the Kodiak By Dutchmen 172E loses about $10,440 — a gap near $-1879.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Heartland Rvs 29MSB sheds about 7% in year one versus 7% for the Kodiak By Dutchmen 172E. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…