Arctic Fox 25Y vs Keystone Rv 240 BH — Depreciation Comparison

Arctic Fox 25Y vs Keystone Rv 240 BH: 5-year value retention (54% vs 54%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Fox 25Y holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Arctic Fox 25Y comes out ahead, holding about 54% of its value versus 54% for the Keystone Rv 240 BH. Over the first five years the Arctic Fox 25Y loses roughly $33,465 while the Keystone Rv 240 BH loses about $17,687 — a gap near $-15778.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Fox 25Y sheds about 29% in year one versus 28% for the Keystone Rv 240 BH. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…