Keystone Rv 240 BH vs Keystone Rv 39 Flft — Depreciation Comparison

Keystone Rv 240 BH vs Keystone Rv 39 Flft: 5-year value retention (54% vs 54%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Keystone Rv 240 BH holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Keystone Rv 240 BH comes out ahead, holding about 54% of its value versus 54% for the Keystone Rv 39 Flft. Over the first five years the Keystone Rv 240 BH loses roughly $17,687 while the Keystone Rv 39 Flft loses about $43,774 — a gap near $26,087.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Keystone Rv 240 BH sheds about 28% in year one versus 27% for the Keystone Rv 39 Flft. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…