Keystone Rv 29 FK vs Keystone Rv 299 Rlds — Depreciation Comparison

Keystone Rv 29 FK vs Keystone Rv 299 Rlds: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Keystone Rv 29 FK holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Keystone Rv 29 FK comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Keystone Rv 299 Rlds. Over the first five years the Keystone Rv 29 FK loses roughly $11,431 while the Keystone Rv 299 Rlds loses about $12,806 — a gap near $1,375.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Keystone Rv 29 FK sheds about 6% in year one versus 6% for the Keystone Rv 299 Rlds. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…