Keystone Rv 359 vs Viking By Forest River 17BHS — Depreciation Comparison

Keystone Rv 359 vs Viking By Forest River 17BHS: 5-year value retention (44% vs 44%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Keystone Rv 359 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Keystone Rv 359 comes out ahead, holding about 44% of its value versus 44% for the Viking By Forest River 17BHS. Over the first five years the Keystone Rv 359 loses roughly $51,548 while the Viking By Forest River 17BHS loses about $17,084 — a gap near $-34464.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Keystone Rv 359 sheds about 21% in year one versus 14% for the Viking By Forest River 17BHS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…