Flagstaff By Forest River 26RBWS vs Keystone Rv 417 — Depreciation Comparison

Flagstaff By Forest River 26RBWS vs Keystone Rv 417: 5-year value retention (57% vs 57%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Flagstaff By Forest River 26RBWS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Flagstaff By Forest River 26RBWS comes out ahead, holding about 57% of its value versus 57% for the Keystone Rv 417. Over the first five years the Flagstaff By Forest River 26RBWS loses roughly $24,714 while the Keystone Rv 417 loses about $36,382 — a gap near $11,668.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Flagstaff By Forest River 26RBWS sheds about 28% in year one versus 8% for the Keystone Rv 417. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…