Alweld 1748 Mud vs Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1748 Mud holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alweld 1748 Mud comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty. Over the first five years the Alweld 1748 Mud loses roughly $1,952 while the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty loses about $19,677 — a gap near $17,725.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1748 Mud sheds about 10% in year one versus 8% for the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…