Kingfisher 1825 Falcon vs Ranger 223FC: 5-year value retention (77% vs 77%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Kingfisher 1825 Falcon holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Kingfisher 1825 Falcon comes out ahead, holding about 77% of its value versus 77% for the Ranger 223FC. Over the first five years the Kingfisher 1825 Falcon loses roughly $6,945 while the Ranger 223FC loses about $12,527 — a gap near $5,582.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Kingfisher 1825 Falcon sheds about 16% in year one versus 7% for the Ranger 223FC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…