Kingfisher 3225 GFX PH vs Tracker Z20 SC Pro Package: 5-year value retention (78% vs 78%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Kingfisher 3225 GFX PH holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Kingfisher 3225 GFX PH comes out ahead, holding about 78% of its value versus 78% for the Tracker Z20 SC Pro Package. Over the first five years the Kingfisher 3225 GFX PH loses roughly $60,849 while the Tracker Z20 SC Pro Package loses about $15,541 — a gap near $-45308.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Kingfisher 3225 GFX PH sheds about 17% in year one versus 11% for the Tracker Z20 SC Pro Package. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…