Kodiak By Dutchmen 222ES vs Kropf 6203 Double Loft: 5-year value retention (66% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Kodiak By Dutchmen 222ES holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Kodiak By Dutchmen 222ES comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 66% for the Kropf 6203 Double Loft. Over the first five years the Kodiak By Dutchmen 222ES loses roughly $11,449 while the Kropf 6203 Double Loft loses about $31,552 — a gap near $20,103.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Kodiak By Dutchmen 222ES sheds about 7% in year one versus 10% for the Kropf 6203 Double Loft. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…