Lance Lance 865 vs Shasta By Forest River 392BL — Depreciation Comparison

Lance Lance 865 vs Shasta By Forest River 392BL: 5-year value retention (53% vs 53%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lance Lance 865 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lance Lance 865 comes out ahead, holding about 53% of its value versus 53% for the Shasta By Forest River 392BL. Over the first five years the Lance Lance 865 loses roughly $20,939 while the Shasta By Forest River 392BL loses about $29,345 — a gap near $8,406.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lance Lance 865 sheds about 18% in year one versus 10% for the Shasta By Forest River 392BL. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…