Living Vehicle Core vs Salem By Forest River 31KQBTS — Depreciation Comparison

Living Vehicle Core vs Salem By Forest River 31KQBTS: 5-year value retention (55% vs 55%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Living Vehicle Core holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Living Vehicle Core comes out ahead, holding about 55% of its value versus 55% for the Salem By Forest River 31KQBTS. Over the first five years the Living Vehicle Core loses roughly $262,481 while the Salem By Forest River 31KQBTS loses about $26,060 — a gap near $-236421.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Living Vehicle Core sheds about 11% in year one versus 20% for the Salem By Forest River 31KQBTS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…