Lowe 1660 SC vs Lund 1775 Impact XS Sport: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe 1660 SC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe 1660 SC comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Lund 1775 Impact XS Sport. Over the first five years the Lowe 1660 SC loses roughly $7,191 while the Lund 1775 Impact XS Sport loses about $16,373 — a gap near $9,182.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe 1660 SC sheds about 17% in year one versus 24% for the Lund 1775 Impact XS Sport. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…